Review



human pulmonary fibroblast line  (PromoCell)


Bioz Verified Symbol PromoCell is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol PromoCell manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    PromoCell human pulmonary fibroblast line
    Human Pulmonary Fibroblast Line, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 117 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human pulmonary fibroblast line/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 117 article reviews
    human pulmonary fibroblast line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    PromoCell human pulmonary fibroblast line
    Human Pulmonary Fibroblast Line, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human pulmonary fibroblast line/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human pulmonary fibroblast line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell c 12360 lot 136 433z024
    C 12360 Lot 136 433z024, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c 12360 lot 136 433z024/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c 12360 lot 136 433z024 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell human pulmonary fibroblasts
    (A) IVIS imaging performed one day after cell administration showing pulmonary localization of transplanted <t>fibroblasts.</t> (B) Representative Masson trichrome-stained lung sections from each group (Day 0, saline (Ctrl), rPF, and rPF + CKs). For each group, whole lung images (top row) and corresponding magnified views (bottom row) are shown to highlight differences in fibrosis and tissue architecture. (C) Quantification of fibrotic area. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. indicated groups.
    Human Pulmonary Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human pulmonary fibroblasts/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human pulmonary fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell human pulmonary fibroblasts hpfs
    Combination treatment of CHIR99021 and 2-ME reverses radiation-induced fibrotic changes, reducing persistent DNA damage in endothelial cells and <t>fibroblasts</t> (A) Schematic representation of irradiation and CHIR99021 treatment in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days of irradiation (10 Gy). Immunofluorescence staining for phalloidin and VE-cadherin detection was performed 6 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (B) Schematic representation of 2-ME and CHIR99021 treatment and irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated (10 Gy) and treated with 2-ME (0.5 μM) after 2 days, followed by CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HUVECs was performed 5 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×); Scale bars = 10 μm; scale bar of cropped images = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (C) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy), 2-ME (0.5 μM), CHIR99021 (3 μM), and hrVEGF (30 ng/mL) treatment in HUVECs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (D) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HUVECs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. (E) HUVECs, irradiated for 48 h, were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates for 3 h in the presence of CHIR99021, 2-ME, CHIR99021+2-ME, or medium only as a control (magnification: 40×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify the number of tubes formed. (F) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy) and 2-ME (0.5 μM) and CHIR99021 (3 μM) treatment in <t>HPFs.</t> Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity (right panels). (G) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (H) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. In graphs (D) and (G), error bars represent SD. The data shown are representative of repeated three independent experiments.
    Human Pulmonary Fibroblasts Hpfs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human pulmonary fibroblasts hpfs/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human pulmonary fibroblasts hpfs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell hpfs
    Combination treatment of CHIR99021 and 2-ME reverses radiation-induced fibrotic changes, reducing persistent DNA damage in endothelial cells and <t>fibroblasts</t> (A) Schematic representation of irradiation and CHIR99021 treatment in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days of irradiation (10 Gy). Immunofluorescence staining for phalloidin and VE-cadherin detection was performed 6 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (B) Schematic representation of 2-ME and CHIR99021 treatment and irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated (10 Gy) and treated with 2-ME (0.5 μM) after 2 days, followed by CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HUVECs was performed 5 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×); Scale bars = 10 μm; scale bar of cropped images = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (C) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy), 2-ME (0.5 μM), CHIR99021 (3 μM), and hrVEGF (30 ng/mL) treatment in HUVECs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (D) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HUVECs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. (E) HUVECs, irradiated for 48 h, were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates for 3 h in the presence of CHIR99021, 2-ME, CHIR99021+2-ME, or medium only as a control (magnification: 40×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify the number of tubes formed. (F) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy) and 2-ME (0.5 μM) and CHIR99021 (3 μM) treatment in <t>HPFs.</t> Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity (right panels). (G) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (H) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. In graphs (D) and (G), error bars represent SD. The data shown are representative of repeated three independent experiments.
    Hpfs, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hpfs/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hpfs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    PromoCell human primary fibroblasts
    Combination treatment of CHIR99021 and 2-ME reverses radiation-induced fibrotic changes, reducing persistent DNA damage in endothelial cells and <t>fibroblasts</t> (A) Schematic representation of irradiation and CHIR99021 treatment in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days of irradiation (10 Gy). Immunofluorescence staining for phalloidin and VE-cadherin detection was performed 6 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (B) Schematic representation of 2-ME and CHIR99021 treatment and irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated (10 Gy) and treated with 2-ME (0.5 μM) after 2 days, followed by CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HUVECs was performed 5 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×); Scale bars = 10 μm; scale bar of cropped images = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (C) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy), 2-ME (0.5 μM), CHIR99021 (3 μM), and hrVEGF (30 ng/mL) treatment in HUVECs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (D) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HUVECs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. (E) HUVECs, irradiated for 48 h, were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates for 3 h in the presence of CHIR99021, 2-ME, CHIR99021+2-ME, or medium only as a control (magnification: 40×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify the number of tubes formed. (F) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy) and 2-ME (0.5 μM) and CHIR99021 (3 μM) treatment in <t>HPFs.</t> Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity (right panels). (G) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (H) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. In graphs (D) and (G), error bars represent SD. The data shown are representative of repeated three independent experiments.
    Human Primary Fibroblasts, supplied by PromoCell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human primary fibroblasts/product/PromoCell
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human primary fibroblasts - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) IVIS imaging performed one day after cell administration showing pulmonary localization of transplanted fibroblasts. (B) Representative Masson trichrome-stained lung sections from each group (Day 0, saline (Ctrl), rPF, and rPF + CKs). For each group, whole lung images (top row) and corresponding magnified views (bottom row) are shown to highlight differences in fibrosis and tissue architecture. (C) Quantification of fibrotic area. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. indicated groups.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Pulmonary fibroblasts activated by the addition of TNF-α and IL-4 enhance lymphangiogenic capacity and ameliorate lung fibrosis in an allogeneic rat model

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342528

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) IVIS imaging performed one day after cell administration showing pulmonary localization of transplanted fibroblasts. (B) Representative Masson trichrome-stained lung sections from each group (Day 0, saline (Ctrl), rPF, and rPF + CKs). For each group, whole lung images (top row) and corresponding magnified views (bottom row) are shown to highlight differences in fibrosis and tissue architecture. (C) Quantification of fibrotic area. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. indicated groups.

    Article Snippet: Human pulmonary fibroblasts were purchased from PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany) and cultured with HFDM-1(+) medium (Cell Science & Technology, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 5% (v/v) Newborn Calf Serum (NBCS) and 1% (v/v) Penicillin-Streptomycin (P/S).

    Techniques: Imaging, Staining, Saline

    (A) Effect of allogeneic rPF or rPF + CKs cell treatment on plasma levels of surfactant protein D (SP-D) levels. (B) Effect of allogeneic rPF or rPF + CKs cell treatment on plasma fibrinogen levels.Pulmonary fibrosis was induced in mice (Day 0), followed by treatment with saline (Ctrl), allogeneic pulmonary fibroblasts (rPF), or cytokine-enriched fibroblasts (rPF + CKs).Plasma samples were collected on day 14 and analyzed for fibrinogen concentration using ELISA.Sample sizes (animal numbers) were as follows: SP-D: Day 0 = 8, Ctrl = 8, rPF = 8, rPF + CKs = 8 Fibrinogen: Day 0 = 7, Ctrl = 7, rPF = 7, rPF + CKs = 7.

    Journal: PLOS One

    Article Title: Pulmonary fibroblasts activated by the addition of TNF-α and IL-4 enhance lymphangiogenic capacity and ameliorate lung fibrosis in an allogeneic rat model

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342528

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Effect of allogeneic rPF or rPF + CKs cell treatment on plasma levels of surfactant protein D (SP-D) levels. (B) Effect of allogeneic rPF or rPF + CKs cell treatment on plasma fibrinogen levels.Pulmonary fibrosis was induced in mice (Day 0), followed by treatment with saline (Ctrl), allogeneic pulmonary fibroblasts (rPF), or cytokine-enriched fibroblasts (rPF + CKs).Plasma samples were collected on day 14 and analyzed for fibrinogen concentration using ELISA.Sample sizes (animal numbers) were as follows: SP-D: Day 0 = 8, Ctrl = 8, rPF = 8, rPF + CKs = 8 Fibrinogen: Day 0 = 7, Ctrl = 7, rPF = 7, rPF + CKs = 7.

    Article Snippet: Human pulmonary fibroblasts were purchased from PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany) and cultured with HFDM-1(+) medium (Cell Science & Technology, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 5% (v/v) Newborn Calf Serum (NBCS) and 1% (v/v) Penicillin-Streptomycin (P/S).

    Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Saline, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Combination treatment of CHIR99021 and 2-ME reverses radiation-induced fibrotic changes, reducing persistent DNA damage in endothelial cells and fibroblasts (A) Schematic representation of irradiation and CHIR99021 treatment in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days of irradiation (10 Gy). Immunofluorescence staining for phalloidin and VE-cadherin detection was performed 6 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (B) Schematic representation of 2-ME and CHIR99021 treatment and irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated (10 Gy) and treated with 2-ME (0.5 μM) after 2 days, followed by CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HUVECs was performed 5 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×); Scale bars = 10 μm; scale bar of cropped images = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (C) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy), 2-ME (0.5 μM), CHIR99021 (3 μM), and hrVEGF (30 ng/mL) treatment in HUVECs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (D) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HUVECs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. (E) HUVECs, irradiated for 48 h, were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates for 3 h in the presence of CHIR99021, 2-ME, CHIR99021+2-ME, or medium only as a control (magnification: 40×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify the number of tubes formed. (F) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy) and 2-ME (0.5 μM) and CHIR99021 (3 μM) treatment in HPFs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity (right panels). (G) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (H) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. In graphs (D) and (G), error bars represent SD. The data shown are representative of repeated three independent experiments.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Combined HIF-1α blockade and CHIR99021 treatment reverses pulmonary fibrosis via modulation endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.114028

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Combination treatment of CHIR99021 and 2-ME reverses radiation-induced fibrotic changes, reducing persistent DNA damage in endothelial cells and fibroblasts (A) Schematic representation of irradiation and CHIR99021 treatment in HUVECs. HUVECs were treated with CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days of irradiation (10 Gy). Immunofluorescence staining for phalloidin and VE-cadherin detection was performed 6 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (B) Schematic representation of 2-ME and CHIR99021 treatment and irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated (10 Gy) and treated with 2-ME (0.5 μM) after 2 days, followed by CHIR99021 (3 μM) after 3 days. Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HUVECs was performed 5 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×); Scale bars = 10 μm; scale bar of cropped images = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (C) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy), 2-ME (0.5 μM), CHIR99021 (3 μM), and hrVEGF (30 ng/mL) treatment in HUVECs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity. (D) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HUVECs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. (E) HUVECs, irradiated for 48 h, were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates for 3 h in the presence of CHIR99021, 2-ME, CHIR99021+2-ME, or medium only as a control (magnification: 40×). Scale bars = 20 μm. Bar graphs quantify the number of tubes formed. (F) Schematic representation of irradiation (10 Gy) and 2-ME (0.5 μM) and CHIR99021 (3 μM) treatment in HPFs. Cell morphology and phalloidin immunofluorescence staining were performed 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 200×). Scale bars = 300 μm. Bar graphs quantify phalloidin intensity (right panels). (G) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of γH2AX in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies the number of γH2AX foci in more than 100 cells. (H) Immunofluorescence staining and quantification of OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog in HPFs 11 days post-irradiation (magnification: 400×). Scale bars = 5 μm. Dot graph quantifies OCT4, Sox2, and Nanog intensity in more than 100 cells. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. In graphs (D) and (G), error bars represent SD. The data shown are representative of repeated three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: Human pulmonary fibroblasts (HPFs) , Promocell , Cat# C-12360.

    Techniques: Irradiation, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Culture, Control